Educating Meghan

Any republican that voted for Mark Sanford in South Carolina but is against gay marriage is an unbelievable hypocrite.

—
Meghan McCain (@MeghanMcCain) May 08, 2013

@MeghanMcCain if it wasn't for politicians cheating on their wives, you wouldn't exist.

—
David Burge (@iowahawkblog) May 08, 2013

“What difference at this point does it make?”

Cover up courtesy of Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Susan Rice, Jay Carney, and the Media Party. Bob Schieffer is acting like this is the first he’s heard of it…

-

-

Rush excerpt:

This whole thing just a mountain of one lie on another, and it was all done to not upset any pre-electoral poll data, and they made sure to jump all over Romney. Romney was the guy most criticized in the American media after the Benghazi attack. Mitt Romney had nothing to do with it, at all. He just issued a presidential statement about it. He objected to this mindless, senseless apology for nothing that came out of our embassy in Cairo. One thing here. Darrell Issa was on Fox America’s Newsroom this morning. Bill Hemmer talked to Issa, who’s gonna be running the hearings on this. Hemmer said, “Based on what you know now, how damaging is all of this to Hillary?”

Benghazi Week In Washington

Political careers will be made & destroyed this week…

The Benghazi Talking Points | The Weekly Standard.

Even as the White House strove last week to move beyond questions about the Benghazi attacks of Tuesday, September 11, 2012, fresh evidence emerged that senior Obama administration officials knowingly misled the country about what had happened in the days following the assaults. The Weekly Standard has obtained a timeline briefed by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence detailing the heavy substantive revisions made to the CIA’s talking points, just six weeks before the 2012 presidential election, and additional information about why the changes were made and by whom.

Benghazi Impeachment Suddenly Not So Far-Fetched – Roger L. Simon

While we are making Watergate analogies, it’s worth noting this is far worse than that noxious moment in American history or the other recent impeachment episode — Clinton.  In the former, some dumb zealots broke into the campaign headquarters of the opposition party in an election that wasn’t remotely close.  Nevertheless, the paranoid Nixon destroyed himself by trying to cover up the idiocy.  Clinton wagged his finger at us and lied about sex under oath, while his wife — an important figure in Benghazi where she has already been caught dissimulating — similarly lied by publicly blaming her husband’s philandering on the “great right-wing conspiracy.” (What power!)

Creepy behavior all around and certainly nothing remotely presidential, but, compared to Benghazi, no one died or was even injured.  As far as I know, no one even stubbed a toe.

Benghazi, on the contrary, was an important battle in the Global War on Terror, which has now reached our shores more than once. It will undoubtedly do so again.  Those who take this casually in the slightest are conscious or unconscious traitors or fools — or so self-interested as to be beneath contempt.

 

 

Ida Siegal @idasiegal4ny Low Information Reporter

Ida Siegal of channel 4 New York doesn’t know what the hammer and sickle represents. The product of the great American education system doesn’t recognize the symbol of 100 million dead people…

Learn From History

“The government will take care of you” – Pro-gun billboard causing a stir » The Right Scoop.

 

 

The Strange Story Of Abdul Rahman Alharbi

Michelle Obama visits Abdul Rahman Alharbi in hospital.

-

-

4 Major Questions That Remain About the Saudi National Tagged as 212(a)(3)(b), ‘Terrorist Activities’

-

-

-

Not sure if its connected but John King goes with a possible story, then gets hung out to dry…

Green Neo-Colonialism

You can’t eat trees…

Poor being thrown off Ugandan land for carbon credits.

When you think about the effects of global warming hysteria, you might think of higher electricity prices, not people being thrown off their land and having their homes burned down. But that is exactly what’s been happening in the East African country of Uganda, where a British company called New Forests has been seizing land to grow trees and then sell the so-called “carbon credits” for a profit that could reach nearly $2 million per year. According to reports published in the New York Times and Telegraph of London, New Forests is backed by the World Bank and has been using armed troops, with the government’s permission, to forcibly evict over 20,000 poor people from their homes. This certainly gives terrible new meaning to the concept of Green neo-colonialism.

Oxfam Canada has information here…
Killing Ugandans to save the planet- Telegraph

Ugandan farmers kicked off their land for New Forests Company’s carbon project – NYT
UK-based Forests Company suspends tree planting in Uganda

Clarification by Govt of Uganda Regarding the Case Study by OXFAM